Telling the stories that the mainstream media no longer tell.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,030 other subscribers

Archives

Categories

Follow me on Twitter

September 2017
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Gresham-Barlow Teachers to Take a Strike Vote April 11

teacher union

Out in East Multnomah County, a low rumble is growing louder as we approach the November elections the end of the school year. Negotiations between a couple of school boards and the teacher unions on new contracts have hit snags in several school districts all at once.

This past week, The Gresham Outlook reported that a strike vote has now been scheduled:

Teachers in the Gresham-Barlow School District will meet at Barlow High School at 4:30 p.m. Wednesday, April 11, and vote on whether to strike.

Representatives of both sides will meet Friday, April 13, to continue contract negotiations.

The district’s school board voted unanimously March 22 to implement a contract on its teachers — although it’s technically not a contract, it’s an “operating structure” because the teachers didn’t agree to it.

Nearly a year of negotiations have failed to yield a new contract, the last one having expired June 30, 2011. The last round of mediated talks ended March 20.

The union can accept the implemented deal as is; accept the agreement but continue to negotiate over unresolved articles; or go on strike. By law, the union must give the district at least 10 days notice before striking.

The Gresham Barlow Education Association is, predictably, not pleased. The following is a list of their ransom note list of requests and observations from the GBEA website (shown in bold). Each demand is rebutted with a reasonable counter point (shown in italics). Feel free to comment on our conclusions regarding the real agenda of the GBEA:


RIF members based upon seniority or “competence” as determined by the district without the possibility of retraining

State law now requires that competence be a consideration when placing teachers in assignments and when reducing staffing levels.  The district’s proposed RIF language simply conforms to state law.

Receive no step or COLA increase for all of next school year

To do so would result in teacher job losses and higher class sizes. Tough decisions have to be made to save teacher jobs and avoid increased class sizes.

Receive a $6 per month increase in insurance starting next year (a 0.6% increase)

Cut 2.6% of your salary from this year (5 day cuts) and remove the money from your remaining checks

These two are a mischaracterization of reality.  A true salary cut would mean we wouldn’t have to cut days.  The district’s ‘burn rate’ is around $330,000 per day.  Every 3 days of school costs approx. $1 million.  Budget realities require either cutting staff or cutting days.  The Board has been steadfast in saying all along that we don’t want any more teachers to lose their jobs.

Reduce prep time at ALL LEVELS by having a common Wednesday professional development time

Not factual.  The only group impacted by the district’s proposed language would be high school teachers who would be equalized with middle and grade school teachers with regards to prep time.  (H.S. teachers currently have 83 min. prep time daily due to the block schedule.  The move to a 7 period schedule will result in prep time of approx. 1 hour, exactly the prep time allowed for middle & grade school teachers now.)

Removes the requirement that the district consult with the GBEA before creating an annual calendar

Removes the requirement that the district receive input from staff, and reach consensus, before changing the structure of the work day at all levels

Allows the district to create positions with hours that are different than their regular building hours

The responsibility to set schedules, structure work days and determine hours of operation is reserved to the people through their elected representatives on the Board of Directors.  It is inappropriate for employees of any organization to presume to dictate hours of operation, programs offered or set schedules for that organization.  The Board insists on retaining those responsibilities to The People.

Allows for ALL counselors to be used as substitutes for up to 2-hours per day

This would only apply in an emergency situation and would be very rarely applied in practical reality.  Example would be if a teacher takes ill or has a family emergency during the school day.  Under district proposed language, the principle of that building would have the option of placing a counselor in that room for 2 hours (maximum) while arrangements are made for a substitute.

Refuses to address any of the GBEA’s concerns regarding violent and medically fragile students

The union, not the district, proposed language for placing disciplinary policy into the contract.  The board insists that the setting of policy for the district is a responsibility reserved to The People through their elected representatives on the Board of Directors and that placement of policy in a labor contract is inappropriate.  Violent, disruptive and medically fragile students are already dealt with in district policy and the Board stand ready to review those policies at all times as concerns or specific situations arise.

 

Propaganda has also been mailed by GBEA to parents in the district:

 

The District wants teachers to keep disruptive and violent students in the classrooms and form a committee run by an outside paid consultant to look into the issues instead of listening to the teachers who work with these students on a daily basis.

 

Let’s call this one what it is; a lie.  Think about it.  “The District WANTS teachers to keep disruptive and violent students in the classroom?”  Right.  They had a meeting and said, ‘what can we do to make learning more difficult?  Hey!  I know!  Let’s flood the classrooms with violent students to disrupt things!”  This is almost too silly for comment, were it not for the fact that the union is prepared to strike over this issue.  (The Board has instructed the Superintendent to research the union’s concerns over violent students and to provide us with data revealing the scope of the problem.  To accomplish this, the district is calling in their insurance provider (at no cost to the district) to collect the data.)

Bottom line: The teacher union is once again engaged in scare tactics, class warfare and outright falsehoods in attempting to advance its agenda. Woe be unto he or she who opposes the union agenda.

 

Previous coverage:

Oregon Teachers, Students Exploited As Pawns In Budget Games

Guest Post: Schools Exist To Educate Children, Not To Employ Teachers

Similar posts

This site sponsored by:

YOU! Your message could reach thousands of online consumers. Click CONTACT to inquire about advertising rates.

Paid advertisement

  • Washington state House Democrats ask Congress to find a solution to keep DACA recipients here September 22, 2017
    This week, all 50 members of the Washington state House Democratic Caucus sent a letter to Speaker Ryan and Majority Leader McConnell requesting that Congress take action in response to President Trump’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Washington state is home for nearly 18,000 young people who are able to […]
  • Morning Wire: Reichert for Gov?, Seattle Seahawks, Rep. Joe Schmick September 20, 2017
    The purpose of the Washington State Wire is to provide smart, strategic content with thoughtful brevity. We create original content, and we lean on the good work of others. We see our role as helping you look ahead just a little bit, to better know where the policy, political, and economic landscape is heading. Your […]
  • Public policy, the will of the voters, and the Seattle Seahawks September 19, 2017
    “Across all demographics, the 12s are contagious. It’s for everybody.” In this quote, King County Council member Jeanne Kohl-Welles was reflecting on the role of the Seattle Seahawks as a unifying force for the Seattle community. It may be hard to remember for some, particularly the new fans that winning has recruited over the last […]
  • Trump Praises Dallas Cowboys for Standing During National Anthem: ‘Big Progress Being Made’ September 26, 2017
    President Donald Trump praised the Dallas Cowboys Tuesday for rising for the national anthem before their Monday night game against the Arizona Cardinals. The post Trump Praises Dallas Cowboys for Standing During National Anthem: ‘Big Progress Being Made’ appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.
  • Jackson Lee Takes a Knee September 26, 2017
    The post Jackson Lee Takes a Knee appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.
  • State Medicaid Adviser Says Graham-Cassidy Bill Will Stabilize Marketplace September 26, 2017
    A state Medicaid adviser told lawmakers on Monday that the Graham-Cassidy bill to replace Obamacare would stabilize the health care marketplace by combining Medicaid populations with younger, healthier individuals. The post State Medicaid Adviser Says Graham-Cassidy Bill Will Stabilize Marketplace appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.
  • Black Population Trends September 25, 2017
    Between 2015 and 2016, the total population of the San Francisco-Oakland urban area grew by 13,773 people, but the black population shrank by 5,839, suggesting that Bay Area land-use policies continue to push low-income people out of the region by making housing unaffordable. The Austin urban area, to its shame, saw a decline of 4,439 […]
  • More 2016 Commuting Data September 22, 2017
    People who earn more than $75,000 a year are more likely to ride transit than people in any other income bracket. Most of those high-income transit riders live not in big cities like New York or Chicago but in suburbs of those cities. That information is from table B08119 from the 2016 American Community Survey. […]
  • Housing Affordability in 2015 September 22, 2017
    Today the Antiplanner continues reviewing 2016 American Community Survey data by looking at housing affordability, a common measure of which is median house prices divided by median family incomes, or value-to-income ratio. Median family incomes are in ACS table B19113, while median home prices are in table B25077. To save you time, I’ve downloaded these […]